Waiting lists and elective surgery: ordering the queue.
نویسندگان
چکیده
In the Australian public health system, access to elective surgery is rationed through the use of waiting lists in which patients are assigned to broad urgency categories. Surgeons are principally responsible for referring patients to waiting lists, deciding on the appropriate urgency category, and selecting patients from the waiting list to receive surgery. There are few agreed-upon criteria to help surgeons make these decisions, leading to striking differences between institutions in proportions of patients allocated to urgency categories. In other countries with publicly funded health systems, programs have been developed that aim to make prioritisation more consistent and access to surgery more equitable. As demand for health care increases, similar programs should be established in Australia using relevant clinical and psychosocial factors. Prioritisation methodology adapted for elective surgery may have a role in prioritising high-demand procedures in other areas of health care.
منابع مشابه
Benchmarking the provision of coronary artery surgery.
Lengthening queues and deaths among patients on waiting lists for coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) have repeatedly sparked professional and public concern since the problem first emerged in Canada during the late 1980s. Although the risk of dying while awaiting CABG is very low, patients carry myriad burdens — social, psychological and financial — when the relief of disabling cardiac...
متن کاملMeasuring waiting times for elective surgery in public hospitals.
The article by Walters et al. raised some very important points related to the problem of long elective surgery waiting lists in Australian public hospitals, including those related to the reporting of waiting lists being a poor indicator of quality for a health service. The number of people on a waiting list does not actually give any indication as to whether patients are being seen within cli...
متن کاملClass and Other Forms of Discrimination in Universal Health Care Systems: The Case of Sweden HORIZONTAL INEQUALITY IN RATIONING BY WAITING LISTS
The objective of this article was to investigate the existence of horizontal inequality in access to care for six categories of elective surgery in a publicly funded system, when care is rationed through waiting lists. Administrative waiting time data on all elective surgeries (n = 4,634) performed in Östergötland, Sweden, in 2007 were linked to national registers containing variables on socioe...
متن کاملImproving the management of waiting lists for elective healthcare services: public perspectives on proposed solutions.
An innovative approach to managing waiting lists and access to elective care, and one that is more fair and consistent with the 'guarantee of access' as stipulated in the Canada Health Act, has been developed by a partnership of medical associations, provincial ministries of health, regional health authorities and research centres. Operating as the Western Canada Waiting List Project, this grou...
متن کاملBooked admissions as a replacement for waiting lists in the new NHS.
RAli 1991;303:1257-8 Admission arrangements for elective surgery often seem archaic and out of step with the public's experience of services outside the National Health Service. In a consumer oriented NHS it would clearly be preferable to offer most patients a mutually agreeable date for admission. We consider here the place of booked admission systems within the NHS and discuss surgeons' own e...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- The Medical journal of Australia
دوره 192 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2010